One real AI system
Apply the framework to a specific use rather than discuss AI risk in the abstract.
Bring a real AI use under control before it becomes a board, regulatory or reputational crisis. Build the executive confidence to govern AI risk, demand credible evidence and defend the actions your organisation takes.
Meet the course lead and explore the practical focus, learning experience, and professional value of this course.
Most organisations did not make a single, deliberate decision to adopt artificial intelligence; it arrived gradually. A vendor introduced a feature, a team began using a public chatbot, or a supplier quietly embedded a model in a workflow. By the time leadership asks who owns the risk, AI may already be influencing decisions that affect customers, employees and the balance sheet—and it can fail in ways ordinary software does not.
This course closes the gap between saying that an organisation “uses AI responsibly” and being able to demonstrate responsibility for a specific system. Participants take one real AI use through the full NIST AI Risk Management Framework cycle: Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. Each stage is demonstrated through a running executive case and then applied to the participant’s chosen system, with a model against which the work can be tested.
By the conclusion, participants hold a defensible risk response: named accountability and risk tolerance, a priority risk and the people it may affect, evidence of what has been measured and what remains uncertain, and a prioritised treatment supported by ownership, third-party terms, incident planning and monitoring. The emphasis is on managerial judgement and practical control rather than technical model development or regulatory box-ticking.
One real AI use, governed through a credible practitioner framework.
Apply the framework to a specific use rather than discuss AI risk in the abstract.
Use NIST AI RMF to organise evidence and decisions, not as a compliance checklist.
Translate technical risk into ownership, treatment, monitoring and defensible action.
Establish governance, accountability and risk tolerance, then map the context, stakeholders, dependencies, risk categories and potential impacts of one real AI use.
Select credible trustworthiness measures and evidence, monitor performance and drift, prioritise treatment, and design escalation and incident-response actions.
Meet the accomplished professionals who successfully completed their doctoral studies in 2025, bringing deep leadership experience and rigorous scholarship to Monarch Switzerland.
Meet the accomplished professionals who successfully completed their doctoral studies in 2025, bringing deep leadership experience and rigorous scholarship to Monarch Switzerland.